Private company transaction data

Private Company Valuation Multiples in 2026

The latest DealStats index shows a sharp first-quarter rise, a measured pullback in Q2, and private-company pricing that remains stronger than most of the past six years.

Peter Fast, CBV Business Valuation October 26, 2026 9 min read
Q2 2026 median selling price to EBITDA
4.1×
Down from 4.8× in Q1, but above every other quarter since Q3 2020.
Based on BVR DealStats data Private-company transactions Data through Q2 2026

Business Valuation Resources’ Q3 2026 DealStats Value Index Digest points to a private-company market that strengthened materially in early 2026. The first-quarter peak eased in Q2, but both EBITDA and revenue multiples remained well above their pre-2026 ranges.

4.1×
Median selling price to EBITDA in Q2 2026, down from 4.8× in Q1.
0.63×
Median selling price to net sales, just below the 0.64× period high.
16%
Median EBITDA margin in Q2, one point higher than Q1.
4.0×
All-time median EBITDA multiple across the sectors shown by BVR.

The signal is constructive, but it is not a shortcut to value. A market median describes a group of completed transactions. It does not account for one company’s earnings quality, size, customer concentration, management depth, growth, capital needs, or deal structure.

The useful question is not “What multiple is the market paying?” It is “Which transactions are genuinely comparable to this business, and what explains the differences?”

EBITDA multiples pulled back from a Q1 peak

The median selling price-to-EBITDA multiple reached 4.8× in Q1 2026, then moved down to 4.1× in Q2. Even after that pullback, Q2 was higher than every quarter in the period shown other than Q1 2026.

The move stands out because the series had been much tighter. From 2023 through 2025, quarterly medians generally sat between 3.2× and 3.9×. The three-quarter average now turns upward as the stronger 2026 observations enter the calculation.

Recreated chart 1

Median selling price / EBITDA

Q3 2020-Q2 2026
Quarterly median selling price to EBITDA multiples The series ranged mostly between 3.2 and 3.9 times from 2023 through 2025, rose to 4.8 times in Q1 2026, and eased to 4.1 times in Q2 2026. 5.0×4.5×4.0× 3.5×3.0×2.5× 4.8×4.1× Q32020 Q32021 Q32022 Q32023 Q32024 Q32025 Q22026 Quarterly median 3-quarter average

Source: Business Valuation Resources, DealStats Value Index Digest, Q3 2026. Trailing average calculated from the quarterly medians shown.

One quarter does not establish a new normal. DealStats also notes that past figures may change as new transactions are reported. For valuation work, the more defensible interpretation is that market evidence strengthened in early 2026, while the durability of that shift still needs to be tested against later quarters and deal-level facts.

Revenue multiples tell a similar story

The revenue series was less volatile but reached the same broad conclusion. Median selling price to net sales rose to 0.64× in Q1 2026 and held at 0.63× in Q2. Before 2026, the highest quarterly observation in the period shown was 0.58×.

Recreated chart 2

Median selling price / net sales

Q3 2020-Q2 2026
Quarterly median selling price to net sales multiples The median was generally between 0.45 and 0.58 times through 2025, then increased to 0.64 times in Q1 2026 and 0.63 times in Q2. 0.70×0.65×0.60× 0.55×0.50×0.45×0.40× 0.64×0.63× Q32020 Q32021 Q32022 Q32023 Q32024 Q32025 Q22026 Quarterly median 3-quarter average

Source: Business Valuation Resources, DealStats Value Index Digest, Q3 2026. Trailing average calculated from the quarterly medians shown.

Revenue multiples can be useful when margins vary or when earnings are temporarily depressed, but they need context. Two companies with the same sales can have very different values if one earns substantially more on each dollar of revenue or needs far more working capital and equipment to support those sales.

Margins remained stable

Median EBITDA margins increased from 15% in Q1 2026 to 16% in Q2. That is close to the recent range: the digest shows quarterly medians largely between 14% and 18% since 2022.

This matters when reading the valuation charts. The higher 2026 multiples did not coincide with a dramatic step-change in median profitability. The report therefore supports a view of stronger transaction pricing, not merely a mechanical response to a sudden margin expansion.

Sector medians vary widely

BVR’s all-time median across the sectors shown is 4.0× EBITDA, but individual sectors range from 2.6× to 10.7×. The latest 12-month observations are more dispersed still, led by finance and insurance at 16.6× and information at 11.0×.

Median selling price / EBITDA by sector
SectorAll periodsLast 12 months
Agriculture, forestry, fishing and hunting6.6×—
Mining, quarrying and oil and gas extraction7.3×4.2×
Utilities8.7×—
Construction3.7×3.5×
Manufacturing5.7×6.7×
Wholesale trade5.1×4.9×
Retail trade3.7×4.0×
Transportation and warehousing3.7×3.8×
Information10.7×11.0×
Finance and insurance7.6×16.6×
Real estate, rental and leasing3.6×5.0×
Professional, scientific and technical services5.5×3.6×
Administrative, support and waste management services3.5×3.5×
Educational services3.7×4.9×
Health care and social assistance4.9×4.3×
Arts, entertainment and recreation3.4×2.9×
Accommodation and food services2.6×2.9×
Other services3.1×3.5×

Source: BVR DealStats Value Index Digest, Q3 2026, Exhibit 3. A dash means the digest did not show a last-12-month value for that sector.

These sector figures are useful as a screening reference, not as a direct pricing table. A broad category can contain businesses with very different scale, recurring revenue, asset intensity, customer risk, growth, and buyer appeal. The unusually high recent figure for finance and insurance is also a reminder that medians can move sharply when the mix of observed deals changes.

What this means for business owners

  • Do not apply 4.1× to reported EBITDA without adjustments. Owner compensation, personal expenses, unusual costs, non-recurring income and related-party rent can all affect maintainable earnings.
  • Keep enterprise value separate from equity value. Transaction multiples usually indicate the value of the operations before considering interest-bearing debt, surplus cash and other non-operating assets or liabilities.
  • Look beyond the industry label. Size, customer concentration, management depth, recurring revenue, growth and capital expenditure requirements often explain more than the sector median alone.
  • Use several valuation methods. Comparable transaction evidence is normally considered alongside an income approach and, where relevant, an asset approach.
  • Treat the quarter as evidence, not a conclusion. Market data can inform judgment, but a valuation must still connect the observed multiples to the specific business and valuation date.

For a fuller explanation of the process, see how a Chartered Business Valuator values a small business. Owners who want to test normalized earnings and the bridge from enterprise value to equity value can also use Acadia Hill’s business valuation calculator as an educational starting point.

Source and attribution

This article is based on the DealStats Value Index Digest, Q3 2026, published by Business Valuation Resources, LLC. The charts and table above were independently recreated from data shown in the digest. DealStats figures may be updated as additional transactions are reported.

Read the original BVR report (PDF)

This article is for general information only. It is not a valuation opinion, investment advice, legal advice or a substitute for analysis of a specific business.

Market data is the starting point. The business tells you where to go next.

If you are preparing for a sale, shareholder transition, tax reorganization or other important decision, Acadia Hill can provide an independent valuation built around the facts of your company.

Book a free consultation
Professional standardCBV-led
PricingFixed fee
LocationWinnipeg
Service areaAcross Manitoba